CGP 2.0 - Delegated Domain Allocation by Questbook

Here are my questions:

  1. Which entity on the DAO side will be signing the contract (via the contract template that was proposed)? Unless there is a legal entity representing the grantors, I don’t see how this would work.

  2. How will Questbook’s compensation be working now (seems to be pro bono initially) and going forward?

  3. Does the need for a grants program to be more decentralized justify this significantly higher cost? My initial thought is that it does not and that there are efficiencies gained from the standard centralized grants committee model that might be lost here (e.g., having a single committee review multiple grant proposals might garner better conversation and review).

  4. I think the tooling that Questbook offers is helpful, but couldn’t the same tooling be provided to a more centralized grants committee?

  5. What is the KYC for potential grant recipients meant to accomplish?

1 Like