Thanks for the great work @cylon and @WintermuteGovernance - Three attempts without increased communication and moving further from voter consensus is highly concerning and should be addressed directly, and broadly. Given quorum related reruns are concerning but currently commonplace toward operational continuity, should we limit beyond the first rerun (2nd attempt), or perhaps categorically ban reruns of proposals voted down, as opposed to simply failing quorum? Please continue to tag and leverage the GSWG tasked with addressing these and related challenges (cc: StableLab @Doo_StableLab, Arana Digital @AranaDigital, & PGov @PGov):
I’ve explored this some in another context. While some DAOs require successful temp-checks ahead of the on-chain vote, what would you recommend @cylon toward an actionable updated general policy to prevent repetitive or ongoing misaligned proposal attempts from going to vote?
@Humpy - In the interest of ensuring I’m not misunderstanding intent, I would engage positively should you or your team take a pause to join or host a community call to increase alignment on your proposal. Along with others I ask that you please consider cancelling your proposal until such time greater parity can be found. I believe this would go a long way toward increasing your ongoing efficacy in advancing proposals successfully, and mitigate any further undue burden to delegates and direct voters through what currently is being construed as a gross misuse of our community’s intended voting procedures.