Building on the recent feedback and discussions, we’d like to share a few thoughts from our perspective.
First, as @PGov mentioned, conducting a pilot phase to gather data and assess the program’s effectiveness before considering the next steps is reasonable. This approach ensures that future decisions are informed by concrete outcomes and insights.
Additionally, promoting delegate diversity is vital for enhancing the long-term quality of governance. A broader range of delegates brings diverse perspectives and ideas, enabling more balanced and inclusive decision-making.
With this in mind, initiating a second Delegate Race could be a valuable step. Such an initiative would not only support active but underrepresented delegates, but also foster greater diversity within the ecosystem.
Also, we’d like to expand on a point raised in our previous comment regarding Community Participation. The proposal states: “Metrics considered will likely be COMP delegated, voting participation, and community participation piggybacking off of the Compound Dashboard’s delegate metrics here.”
However, Compound Delegate Analytics Dashboard primarily focuses on Participation Score, Voting Impact Score, and Voting Before/After Threshold.
Do you have any ideas on how the community participation could be incorporated into the scoring system? If so, we’d love to hear them.
We’re looking forward to hearing your thoughts and continuing this constructive discussion. Thank you!