The existential risks if severe enough should invalidate the token for inclusion on their own
hopefully i’m understanding you correctly, i think we’re on the same page?
to me, as long as the inclusion of the asset doesn’t bank run compound, it should be fine to list. of course that includes a lack of liquidity, project security, etc, etc. idk what other criteria would be needed for a ‘strong fit’
the downside of, ‘not a lot of xyzzy coin will be deposited’ i don’t think hurts anybody. the thing i feel is most important for compound is giving control of personal finances back to the user, and if the system can handle it, we should list it.
to the case of sushi - i agree that it would be the best solution in the long term, but writing then auditing that contract is gonna take some time, and for no great reason. given how modular things are, it should be pretty easy to add the improved sushi contract in the future when we have it.