HKUST EPI Labs Blockchain Delegate Platform

Governance Process
22

Poll #164: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objections top-up proposals by gauntlet within their scope of work on incentive optimisation.
1 Like
23

Poll #165: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the contractual payout to OpenZeppelin
1 Like
24

Poll #166: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the migration procedures
1 Like
25

Poll #167: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the migration procedures
1 Like
26

Poll #168: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the change of interest curve, as similar to other protocols, and the split of COMP rewards to suppliers.
1 Like
27

Poll #169: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on assessments made by Gauntlet for the increase of the various token supply.
1 Like
28

Poll #170: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the pausing of minting cTokens for V2 markets to mitigate against tail end risk from liquidity crunch, in addition these tokens are also available on the v3 market in which the protocol is attempting to migrate collaterals and users over.
1 Like
29

Poll #171: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on expanding Compound to Base chain with Gauntlet’s risk parameter and reward mechanism assessment.
1 Like
30

Poll #172: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on onboarding maticX as collateral on polygon to USDCv3 market.
1 Like
31

Poll #173: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on Gauntlet’s incentive optimisation revision on arbitrum.
32

Poll #174: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on expansion to BASE as other protocols has also implemented plans to do so.
1 Like
33

Poll #174: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on with Gauntlet’s assessment, with the introduction of eDSR on Maker. Compound is required to make its parameters more attractive to attract a different/new demographic of userbase.
1 Like
34

Poll #176: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the parameter adjustments in order to stay relevant and competitive in a market trying to draw as like ETH LSDs onto the protocols.
1 Like
35

Poll #177: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on increase in supply of BTC on polygon due to demand.
1 Like
36

Poll #178: would have Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on deployment of USDCv3 onto arbitrum
1 Like
37

Poll #180: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the encouraged migration from and deprecation of the v2 markets.
1 Like
38

Poll #181: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the continued service from Gauntlet which has proven to be beneficial to the protocol.
3 Likes
39

Poll #182: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the increase of daily COMP emission as rewards on arbitrum as suggested by Gauntlet.
2 Likes
40

Poll #184: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the onboarding of stMATIC on polygon markets, stMATIC is one of the core assets for the polygon market.
1 Like
41

Poll #185: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the continued engagement of a service provider for the protocol.
1 Like