HKUST EPI Labs Blockchain Delegate Platform

Governance Process
42

Poll #186: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on the continued deprecation of the v2 markets and using a smoother approach on the reduction of the collateralisation factors.
1 Like
43

Poll #187: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection on investment of assets in a more volatility market using aeras but one should always be vigilant about potential losses.
1 Like
44

Poll #188: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the wBTC cap increase on arbitrum the utilisation is nearing the cap.
1 Like
45

Poll #189: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to funding of the grant programme to encourage more innovation and hopefully provides protocol integrations to new protocols.
1 Like
46

Poll #190: Voted For
Comments:

  • We would have voted For
    • No objection to depreciation plans for V2.
1 Like
47

Poll #192: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to adding rETH as collateral to remain competitive amongst the other protocols.
1 Like
48

Poll #193: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to phase 4 v2 market deprecation procedures

Poll #194: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the funding of more COMP tokens to v3 for user incentives.
1 Like
49

Poll #195: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to change of interest rates to remain competitive. though it should be noted that Gauntlet is the risk assessor for various other protocols, hence the “competitiveness” of the interest rates are judgemental due to similar changes performed to other protocols.
1 Like
50

Poll #197: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to proposed raise in supply caps for both ARB and wBTC to promote the market growth on the ARB chain.
1 Like
51

Poll #198: would have Voted For
Comments:

  • We would have voted For
    • No objection to having OpenZeppelin on payroll as a service provider for the protocol.
1 Like
52

Poll #199: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the earmarked funds for protocol growth and integrations, but deliverables and monitoring on the counterparties should be performed to ensure that there is progression.
2 Likes
53

Poll #200: would have Voted For
Comments:

  • We would have voted For
    • No objection to the v2 deprecation process.
1 Like
54

Poll #201: would have Voted For
Comments:

  • We would have voted For
    • No objection to the proposed interest slope changes.
1 Like
55

Poll #203: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the bug bounty reward for the vulnerabilities discovered. It is always appreciated and encouraged to have people actively looking out for the protocol.
1 Like
56

Poll #204: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the recommended decrease in COMP rewards.
1 Like
57

Poll #205: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the recommended interest rate increase.
1 Like
58

Poll #206: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the COMP rewards being bridged to polygon for rewards emissions.
1 Like
59

Poll #207: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the increase of the interest rates via the curve for the various chains.
1 Like
60

Poll #210: Would have Voted For
Comments:

  • We would have voted For
    • No objection to Gauntlet’s recommendation on the decrease in rewards inline with all other recommendations.
1 Like
61

Poll #211: Voted For
Comments:

  • We voted For
    • No objection to the increase in interest rate inline with the other previous proposals.
1 Like