We believe it’s important for Compound Governance to examine different ways to encourage more voting while ensuring malicious voting or governance exploits are prevented.
This is a placeholder discussion post to seek potential collaborator on the researcher on the Working Group. Look forward to hear more comments and suggestions. This will be updated as more information comes out
Quorum is currently set at 4% in favor (400,000 COMP) of the total supply (10,000,000 COMP). It appears that of the 8 recent quorum failures 6 (75%) resulted in passed reruns, indicating that quorum could be causing inefficiencies. While lowering the quorum would likely improve the passage rate of proposals that are operationally necessary or ultimately desirable, it would decrease the cost of a malicious governance attack and so should be carefully considered along with other options.
Working Group Compositions
There is a Compound Growth Program supporting AlphaGrowth following a 4 month trial that recently narrowly failed to pass a vote for 12-month renewal.
The Compound Grants Program was an endeavor to fund 27,000 COMP across 4 domains (Protocol Ideas & dApps, Dev Tooling, Multi-Chain Strategy, Security Tooling). This program failed to renew in July of 2023.
Delegate Landscape
Recently active top voters appear evenly distributed, with about 50k COMP voted by the top 10 or so delegates:
Wintermutegovernance.eth
gauntletgov.eth
InstaDApp
Calblockchain.eth
She256.eth
0x070341aa5e…9b1a46b4961b
Michiganblockchain.eth
0x590f636a0e…ef82fdb5d954
0x7b3c54e17d…e2f50c4ecc33
Blockchaincolumbia.eth
TennisBowling
Other active voters in the 25k COMP region:
pgov.eth
Kyber Network
Around half of the votes are typically by voters that are voting less than 1 COMP.