Tané Delegate Platform

Governance Process
1

Tané Delegate

tane-logo
tane-logo480×480 9.53 KB

Name: Tané

Delegate Address: tanegov.eth / 0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7

Tally Delegate Profile: Tané - tanegov.eth's Delegate Profile

Introduction

Tané is formed with a group of crypto-native product builders, based in Tokyo, Dubai and New York. We are backed by SoftBank, and Japanese tech giants like DeNA, GREE, MIXI, and closely work with the big Japanese enterprises and have great relationship with Japanese crypto communities.

Our investment arm has invested in and supported various innovating projects that contribute to the decentralized society enabled by the new blockchain technology. Our network operation entity started directly contributing to the ecosystem by being node operators for the core infrastructures and protocols that make Web3 move forward and contributors to the DAOs that manage them. We have been active as delegates in Arbitrum, Optimism, Uniswap, Lido and more.

Takeshi, Head of Network Operations, who worked for Twitter as a senior software engineer and for SmartNews, a Japanese unicorn startup that provides a news aggregation mobile app with 30M MAU as a product manager, is the main representative of the account.

Contact Information

X (Twitter): @tanelabs

Email: gov@tanelabs.com

Web: https://tanelabs.com

Discord: tksohishi

Telegram: takeshi55555

Our contributions to Compound governance

Compound is one of the most established and significant protocols in the DeFi ecosystem. We believe that supporting its healthy growth and sustainability is crucial for the continued development of DeFi as a whole.

At Tané, we aim to make constructive contributions to the governance process by actively participating in proposal reviews, engaging in discussions, and voting decisively. Leveraging our unique position that bridges the Japanese and global markets, we strive to bring fresh perspectives and value to the Compound community.

Moreover, we place great importance on building open and collaborative relationships with other participants and community members, supporting the growth of both the protocol and the broader ecosystem.

Our Skills and Areas of Expertise

Technical and Ecosystem Knowledge

We bring unique expertise as product builders (entrepreneurs, software engineers, and product managers) in the tech industry, leveraging our experience to provide critical feedback and insights on technical upgrades and challenges. These experiences enable us to contribute meaningfully to the growth and sustainability of the ecosystem.

Validator Expertise

Our network operation entity has contributed to the crypto ecosystem as validators for core infrastructures and protocols such as Ethereum, Avalanche, Celestia, Secret Network and more. Through these activities, we have gained valuable insights into protocol operations and security, which we aim to apply in governance discussions and DAO contributions.

Japan and Asia-based Representation

There are many users and traders using crypto products in Japan, but there are no prominent delegates who actively participate in and contribute to DAO governance from Japan yet. We are aiming to be the one who represents Japanese and broader Asian users and token holders by being active in the governance, leveraging partnerships with Japanese enterprises and making meaningful impacts on the protocols and the ecosystem.

Values and Decision-Making Approach

We have established our Delegate Core Values as below and demonstrated our delegate activities and decision makings based on them.

Integrity

We value integrity a lot. We believe integrity is the most important virtue even in the industry that values trustless and permissionless. In fact, even though we should aim for governance minimization in the end, the protocols should still need governance and it requires capable and sincere participants. We should be the one of them.

Diversity

Diversity is one of the most important values to achieve decentralization. We are very unique in various perspectives including the geographical diversity (Japan and Asia). We also value diversities provided by other actors and are willing to appreciate them and collaborations with them.

Practicality

We believe in the progressive decentralization. While considering the decentralization is the ultimate goal for crypto/blockchain projects to achieve, we sometimes value practicality and approaches that get things done rather than getting stuck in pursuing the “decentralization” too much from the start.

Transparency

We believe transparency is the vital trait in the decentralized systems. We communicate our findings, feedback, opinions, disagreements and praises in a clear and constructive manner. We believe transparent communications should lead to better discussions and decisions to thrive.

Disclosures/Conflicts

Our investment arm, operating as a separate entity, has invested in a number of crypto startups. While these investments may present potential conflicts of interest in certain situations, we do not believe there are any clear conflicts in terms of contributing to this protocol at the time of writing this profile.

We are also active participants in other DAOs, including Arbitrum, Optimism (as an S6 Grants Council member), Uniswap, and others in the future.

To ensure transparency, we will update this thread with our voting activities and the rationales behind them. Please feel free to reach out to us anytime with your opinions, comments, or feedback.

2

[Gauntlet] Supply Cap Recommendations - Part 1 (10/24) (Onchain)

Summary: This recommendation aims to increase supply caps for various assets across multiple Comets.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal is expected to meet the increasing market demand, enhance protocol stability, and improving user experience.

[Gauntlet] - Incentive Recommendations and Rewards Top Up (2024-10-24) (Onchain)

Summary: Gauntlet recommends updating the IR Curves for all WETH comets to increase the borrow APR. Also they recommends revising Daily COMP Rewards to better adjust for incentive spend relative to borrowing and curb the high incentive spend per dollar borrowed.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: Adjusting the IR curve is a flexible approach in response to market demand. Additionally, reducing excessive incentive spending would ease the financial burden on the protocol. Through these adjustments, it could reduce the risk of excessive utilization, balancing ease of use for users with the protocol’s profitability.

Initialize cUSDEv3 on Mantle (Onchain)

Summary: [Proposal for the deployment of Compound III USDe market on Mantle network.]

Vote: FOR

Rationale: [The user bases of both Compound and Mantle are expected to expand. Also, Mantle Treasury holds substantial assets and it is expected to benefit from the growth of the Mantle ecosystem.]

Add wUSDM as collateral into cUSDTv3 on Ethereum (Onchain)

Summary: Compound Growth Program proposes adding wUSDM, a yield-bearing stablecoin fully backed by US Treasuries, as collateral to cUSDTv3 on Ethereum network.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: Using wUSDM as collateral allows users to arbitrage yields even when borrow rates are low. Additionally, since USDM is available on multiple chains, Compound can expand its user base, increase liquidity, and improve risk diversification.

Aera <> Compound Extension Part 2 (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal suggests using Aera to deploy Compound V2’s surplus assets (DAI, USDC, ETH) in lending markets to increase treasury revenue.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: The USDC and DAI reserves are high enough, so even if the market changes, funds can be taken from the Aera vault to cover it. This proposal shows careful risk management that stays within safe limits.

Add ETHx as collaterals into cWETHv3 on Mainnet (Onchain)

Summary: The proposal is to deploy ETHx, a decentralized LST issued by Stader Labs, on cWETHv3 on the Ethereum network.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: By listing ETHx before competing DeFi protocols, Compound is expected to enhance its competitive edge. ETHx also seems low-risk because of its careful initial settings, strong decentralization, and sufficient liquidity. However, if demand changes, these settings might need to be adjusted in the future.

[Gauntlet]Supply Cap Recommendations20241104 (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to increase supply caps for various assets across multiple Comets, with the goal of improving capital efficiency, reducing slippage during liquidations, and ensuring sufficient liquidity within the protocol.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: In some assets, a small number of addresses hold most of the supply cap, so increasing the caps could affect large suppliers and potentially increase concentration risk. However, it is clear that demand is very high, and the current supply caps are likely insufficient to meet this demand. From this point and a liquidity perspective, raising the supply caps seems necessary.

Add wUSDM as collateral into cUSDTv3 on Optimism (Onchain)

Summary: Compound Growth Program proposes adding wUSDM, a yield-bearing stablecoin fully backed by US Treasuries, as collateral to cUSDTv3 on Optimisim network.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: Using wUSDM as collateral allows users on Compound to secure a stable yield through arbitrage, even when borrowing rates are low. While the current circulating supply is limited, the Optimism Yield-bearing assets incentive program is expected to promote ecosystem growth, which would also bring grant funds to Compound.

Add sFRAX as collateral into cUSDTv3 on Ethereum (Onchain)

Summary: The proposal suggests deploying $sFRAX, issued by Frax Finance, on the cUSDTv3 market on the Ethereum network. $sFRAX distributes a portion of the Frax protocol’s yield to its holders weekly in FRAX, with an annual yield (APY) aligned with the U.S. IORB rate.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal offers advantages based on the high liquidity and reliability of FRAX, as well as the opportunity for users to leverage their assets for greater returns. Since the APY of $sFRAX is linked to the U.S. IORB rate, it is expected to provide a stable yield aligned with economic conditions, making it an attractive source of income for users. Additionally, it adds more options for collateral on Compound, helping users diversify their portfolios.

[Gauntlet] Supply Cap Recommendations (11/11/24) (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to increase supply caps for various assets across multiple Comets to increase capital efficiency within the Comets. The daily utilization rate exceeds 75% of the supply cap for the assets, and the top suppliers are concentrated among large addresses.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: In some assets, a small number of addresses hold most of the supply cap, so increasing the caps could affect large suppliers and potentially increase concentration risk. However, it is clear that demand is very high, and the current supply caps are likely insufficient to meet this demand. From this point and a liquidity perspective, raising the supply caps seems necessary.

1 Like
3

Add sUSDS as collateral into cUSDSv3 on Mainnet (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to add sUSDS as a collateral asset to the USDS market deployed in Compound V3. USDS is an upgraded version of DAI, which can be exchanged 1:1 with DAI on Sky’s platform. Additionally, by staking USDS in the Sky Savings Rate module, users can receive sUSDS tokens and earn a 6.25% interest rate as rewards.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: The current APR for stablecoins on Compound is lower compared to Sky Protocol. However, deploying the USDS market and listing sUSDS can address this issue. The upgrade of Dai has the potential to attract more users and increase liquidity. Deploying the USDS market presents an opportunity for Compound to benefit from these advantages.

Add wUSDM as collateral into cUSDTv3 on Optimism (Snapshot or Onchain)

Summary: Compound Growth Program proposes adding wUSDM, a yield-bearing stablecoin fully backed by US Treasuries, as collateral to cUSDCv3 on Optimisim network.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: Using wUSDM as collateral allows users on Compound to secure a stable yield through arbitrage, even when borrowing rates are low. While the current circulating supply is limited, the Optimism Yield-bearing assets incentive program is expected to promote ecosystem growth, which would also bring grant funds to Compound.

[Gauntlet] Risk Parameter Recommendations for LINK and UNI (Oct 2024) - Part Two (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to revise and adjust the supply cap and risk parameters to address the tail risks, such as high volatility and low liquidity, associated with LINK and UNI in the USDT Comet.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: Since LINK and UNI exhibit high volatility, the revision of the Liquidation Factor and Collateral Factor enables faster liquidations, reducing the platform’s loss risk. Additionally, raising the liquidation penalty incentivizes liquidators, making the process more efficient and improving risk management. Furthermore, as the utilization rates of the supply caps are significantly low, reducing the supply caps is unlikely to negatively impact market liquidity or borrowing demand. The impact on positions with increased liquidation risk is also limited, making this proposal reasonable.

Return Accidentally Sent Funds #4 (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to return 90% of the WBTC mistakenly sent to cUSDCv3 on mainnet, amounting to 58,434.95 USDC. The return is based on the community’s policy for accidental transfers, ensuring fairness and user trust.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This action strengthens the community’s commitment to user protection and increases trust in the protocol. While the return involves a 10% penalty and a reduction in reserves, it follows a transparent and fair process. This ensures that accidental transfers are handled clearly, improving the protocol’s reputation as user-friendly while balancing user protection and protocol sustainability.

Renewing the Compound Governance Working Group (GWG) (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal seeks to extend the activities of the Compound Governance Working Group (GWG) for one year. Its objectives include improving voter participation, enhancing transparency in fund management, and introducing a new delegate reward program to strengthen governance. The requested budget is $280,000 worth of COMP tokens, to be utilized for escrow-managed funds, grants, and tool development to support community operations.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: During its trial period, the GWG achieved clear results, such as improving voter participation and resolving quorum issues. This proposal offers practical ideas to solve important challenges in Compound governance, such as a new delegate reward program and better transparency in fund management.

Add wUSDM as collateral into cUSDCv3 on Arbitrum (Onchain)

Summary: Compound Growth Program proposes adding wUSDM, a yield-bearing stablecoin fully backed by US Treasuries, as collateral to cUSDCv3 on Arbitrum network.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: By adding wUSDM as a new collateral asset, users can leverage arbitrage opportunities utilizing its 5% annual yield, enabling efficient asset management even in low borrow rate environments.
Furthermore, as a stable collateral asset with minimal price volatility, wUSDM allows users to manage their positions efficiently while reducing risks.

[Gauntlet] Rewards Contract Top-Up for Ethereum and Base (11/26/24) (Onchain)

Summary: Gauntlet proposes adding additional COMP tokens to the Rewards Contracts for Ethereum and Base to ensure the continuation of reward distributions. These Rewards Contracts are smart contracts that manage the distribution of incentives to protocol users, aiming to promote usage and activate the ecosystem.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: Compound is experiencing growing demand in various markets, and maintaining competitiveness requires offering attractive incentives for borrowers. While high interest rates are already appealing, enhancing incentives remains a reasonable step to encourage broader protocol adoption. With appropriate adjustments, replenishing the rewards contracts is a justified appraoch.

Alternate Governance track for Market Updates - Optimism (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to introduce a mechanism that allows market parameter updates, which currently constitute the majority of proposals, to be implemented without going through the convintional governance process of voting. This is intended to accelerate decision making within the protocol and enable more efficient utilization of community resources.

Vote: For

Rationale: This proposal is deemed appropriate as a mechanism to significantly reduce the frequency of voting and alleviate the burden on participants. It achieves a balance between efficiency and security through the introduction of timelocks and guardian roles. However, it is considered necessary to establish rules for notification to ensure transparency and implement features for referencing change histories. These measures would make it easier for participants to understand the details of changes and enhance the overall reliability of the system.

Add mETH as collateral into cUSDTv3 on Mainnet (Onchain)

Summary: Mantle proposes adding mETH as a collateral asset to cUSDTv3 on the Ethereum Mainnet. mETH is an ERC-20 liquid staking token issued when ETH is staked in the Mantle Liquid Staking Protocol. With mETH, users can trade their staked assets while keeping them locked in the staking process.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: Continuous risk monitoring is essential as Mantle pursues its strategy to expand its ecosystem through collaboration with Compound. By strengthening the connection between Compound and Mantle Network, this proposal aims to activate capital flows between the two, potentially enhancing the value of Compound itself.

Compound Sandbox: Development Proposal (Onchain)

Summary: WOOF! proposes the development of a new permissionless money-market platform, “Compound Sandbox,” based on Compound v3. This project aims to create a system that allows testing the safety and practicality of new markets before they are directly introduced to the main Compound protocol. Through this mechanism, the project seeks to increase Compound’s TVL and strengthen its Treasury.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: We believe that the proposal to introduce Compound Sandbox has the potential to realize governance efficiency, which is currently a key focus for the protocol. By allowing anyone to freely create and test markets, it decentralizes the experimentation process for new markets and reduces the overall burden on the protocol. Additionally, the process of promoting only successful markets to the main protocol simplifies the traditional steps of “proposal → discussion → voting → execution,” accelerating the protocol’s overall growth.

[Gauntlet] Supply Cap Recommendations (11/27/24) (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to increase supply caps for various assets across multiple Comets to increase capital efficiency within the Comets. The daily utilization rate exceeds 75% of the supply cap for the assets, and the top suppliers are concentrated among large addresses.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: In some assets, a small number of addresses hold most of the supply cap, so increasing the caps could affect large suppliers and potentially increase concentration risk. However, it is clear that demand is very high, and the current supply caps are likely insufficient to meet this demand. From this point and a liquidity perspective, raising the supply caps seems necessary.

[Gauntlet] - IR Curve and Incentive Recommendations for Stablecoin and WETH Comets - Part 1 (Onchain)

Summary: Gauntlet recommends updating the interest rate curves to optimize WETH and Stablecoin Comets in line with thier market demand.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal is a concrete implementation of the recently discussed opinion that “supply-side incentives should be strengthened, and borrow-side incentives should be reduced,” and the reasons for agreement are clear. By increasing supply rates at low utilization, it aims to provide attractive returns for suppliers and promote liquidity provision. On the other hand, borrow-side incentives have been reviewed by raising borrow rates at high utilization, effectively curbing excessive borrowing.

[Gauntlet] - IR Curve and Incentive Recommendations for Stablecoin and WETH Comets along with Rewards Top-up recommendations (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal suggests revising COMP rewards for Mainnet Comets. It also includes a renewed proposal to top up rewards for Mainnet and Base Comets, which was previously proposed but not achieved in the #372 [Gauntlet] Rewards Contract Top-Up for Ethereum and Base vote.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal also addresses the need to adjust COMP rewards to better align with market dynamics. By reducing borrow-side COMP rewards, it aims to curb excessive spending and promote a more sustainable incentive structure. Meanwhile, maintaining robust supply-side rewards ensures continued liquidity provision and supports the protocol’s competitiveness in attracting suppliers. This balanced approach reflects the evolving needs of the market while preserving the protocol’s long-term stability.

[Gauntlet] Supply Cap Recommendations (12/09/24) (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to increase supply caps for various assets across multiple Comets to increase capital efficiency within the Comets. The daily utilization rate exceeds 75% of the supply cap for the assets, and the top suppliers are concentrated among large addresses.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: In some assets, a small number of addresses hold most of the supply cap, so increasing the caps could affect large suppliers and potentially increase concentration risk. However, it is clear that demand is very high, and the current supply caps are likely insufficient to meet this demand. From this point and a liquidity perspective, raising the supply caps seems necessary.

1 Like
4

[Gauntlet] - IR Curve and Incentive Recommendations for Stablecoin and WETH Comets - Part 3 (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal is Part 3, following Part 1, which reviewed the interest rate curves for WETH and Stablecoin Comets, and Part 2, which focused on revising COMP rewards. This time, the proposal aims to optimize the interest rate curves for USDT (cUSDTv3), USDC (cUSDCv3), and WETH (cWETHv3) across multiple chains, including Arbitrum.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal is a concrete implementation of the recently discussed opinion that “supply-side incentives should be strengthened, and borrow-side incentives should be reduced,” and the reasons for agreement are clear. By increasing supply rates at low utilization, it aims to provide attractive returns for suppliers and promote liquidity provision. On the other hand, borrow-side incentives have been reviewed by raising borrow rates at high utilization, effectively curbing excessive borrowing.

[Gauntlet] - IR Curve and Incentive Recommendations for Stablecoin and WETH Comets - Part 4 (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal is Part 4, following Parts 1 to 3, which reviewed the interest rate curves for WETH and Stablecoin Comets. This proposal specifically targets the adjustment of interest rate curves for Arbitrum USDT and Base USDC Comets, as well as the revision of COMP rewards for Mainnet USDS and Arbitrum WETH Comets.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal optimizes interest rate curves for select Comets and adjusts COMP rewards to align with market needs. By refining borrowing and supply incentives, it ensures efficient liquidity provision while curbing excessive spending. This targeted approach supports sustainability and competitiveness across chains.

[Gauntlet] - IR Curve and Incentive Recommendations for Stablecoin and WETH Comets - Part5 (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal is a continuation of Parts 1 to 4, which reviewed the interest rate curves for WETH and Stablecoin Comets as well as COMP rewards. This proposal focuses on increasing the supply caps for certain assets and revising the interest rate curves for Mainnet USDS and Base USDC Comets.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal improves capital efficiency by increasing supply caps and aligns interest rate curves with market demand. These changes enhance liquidity, promote competitiveness, and support the protocol’s adaptability in a dynamic market.

[Gauntlet] - IR Curve and Incentive Recommendations for Stablecoin and WETH Comets - Part 6 & Cap recommendations (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal is a continuation of Parts 1 to 5, which reviewed the interest rate curves for WETH and Stablecoin Comets as well as COMP rewards. This proposal focuses on increasing the supply caps for certain assets and revising the interest rate curves for Mainnet USDC and USDT Comets.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal aims to enhance liquidity and capital efficiency by increasing supply caps for key assets and adjusting interest rate curves for Mainnet USDC and USDT Comets. While we support these changes as they address growing demand and align with market conditions, we recommend providing additional data, such as utilization trends, to validate the necessity of these adjustments.

[Gauntlet] - IR Curve and Incentive Recommendations for Stablecoin and WETH Comets - Part 7 & Cap recommendations (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal is a continuation of Parts 1 to 6, which reviewed the interest rate curves for WETH and Stablecoin Comets as well as COMP rewards. In Part 7, the focus is on increasing the supply caps for specific assets and revising the interest rate curves for Optimism USDC and USDT Comets.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal is a continuation of the adjustments made in Parts 1 through 6 and represents a consistent step in the ongoing improvement process. Considering that previous proposals have been aligned with market trends, this adjustment also appears well-reasoned and necessary.

[Gauntlet] - Cap recommendations (01/21/25) (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to increase supply caps for various assets across multiple Comets to increase capital efficiency within the Comets. The daily utilization rate exceeds 75% of the supply cap for the assets, and the top suppliers are concentrated among large addresses.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: In these assets, a small number of addresses hold most of the supply cap, which may be insufficient to meet demand. From a liquidity perspective, raising the supply caps appears necessary.

[Gauntlet] - IR Curve and Incentive Recommendations for Stablecoin and WETH Comets - Part 8

Summary: This proposal is a continuation of Parts 1 to 7, which reviewed the interest rate curves for WETH and Stablecoin Comets as well as COMP rewards. This proposal focuses on revising the interest rate curves for Polygon USDC and USDT comet and IR curves along with Scroll USDC comet.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: This proposal is a continuation of the adjustments made in Parts 1 through 7 and represents a consistent step in the ongoing improvement process. Considering that previous proposals have been aligned with market trends, this adjustment also appears well-reasoned and necessary.

5

Comound Safe Harbor (Onchain)

Summary: The proposal introduces Safe Harbor to Compound Finance’s bug bounty program, allowing whitehat hackers to recover and return funds during blackhat attacks. Whitehats receive 10% of recovered funds, capped at $600,000, ensuring an incentive-driven yet financially controlled mechanism.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: We support the proposal to implement Safe Harbor because it improves the protocol’s emergency response by enabling swift action from whitehat hackers. This helps reduce the risk of fund losses during blackhat attacks. Additionally, since this implementation does not require additional costs, it is a beneficial upgrade to the existing bug bounty program without imposing financial burdens.

Update USDC, USDT and USDS Comets on Mainnet to support more collaterals (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal upgrades Compound III’s USDC, USDT, and USDS Comets on Ethereum to support up to 24 collaterals. These markets are the most used on Mainnet, but contract size limitations have been a bottleneck, which this update aims to resolve.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: Introducing the AssetListFactory removes contract size constraints, allowing flexible collateral additions for mainnet’s principal markets (USDC, USDT, USDS). This expansion is expected to boost liquidity and strengthen competitiveness, with OpenZeppelin’s audit concerns already addressed. Given strong community support and manageable risks, I believe the benefits outweigh any potential downsides. Thus, a favorable vote is justified.

Compound Governor Contracts Upgrade (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal upgrades Compound’s Governor contracts to improve governance flexibility. It enables adjustable proposal thresholds, quorum, voting delay, and period while introducing Flexible Voting and future upgradeability.

Vote: FOR

Rationale: We support this proposal as it enhances governance flexibility. It is expected to enable adjustments such as lowering the COMP requirement to encourage small holders’ participation, raising the quorum to strengthen security, and modifying voting delay and period for faster decision-making and greater fairness. These improvements make governance more adaptable and inclusive.

2 Likes