I’m new here so I’m not sure where this question falls under. I refer to a proposal on compound on increasing the WBTC factor to 75% (Set WBTC Collateral Factor to 75% - #8 by jmo). I noticed that, that proposal succeeded, but some reason, the cap is 65%.
I’ve followed the discussion, and noted that Gauntlet voted against that proposal, but accidentally approved it. First, can I confirm that there is no intent of following through with that proposal and increasing the collateral factor? Second, how is the community supporting operational mistakes such as accidentally approving the vote? During the attack on Coinbase oracle/DAI, that could be argued as a mistake as well, and people lost money during that attack. I’m just wondering how binding governance proposals are.