I’ve been following this grant over from the Compound V3 Alternative UI and I don’t understand the reason for doing this “alternative front-end”?
What is the painpoints that have been observed with users (in what target group?) that has prompted this project, and what KPI’s will validate if the project solved the problem / provided the intended value for the target users?
I ask because I see no mention of target user groups (for example with Persona’s or equivalent), use-case scenarios, research (usability tests, interviews, observation) on what doesn’t work on https://app.compound.finance that this “different UI/UX” will solve for. And without that, it’s really difficult to give any feedback on the UI/UX of this project.
This project isn’t aimed at addressing any particular shortfall in the existing interface. By introducing an additional interface, the goal is to provide users with a wider range of choices.
Furthermore, having a backup interface in case of issues enhances the protocol’s robustness.
Being open source, this project enables other developers interested in building on Compound to draw inspiration from the code.
I also want to emphasize that I’m open to collaboration and encourage contributions and feedback on this project.