Hey @juan_salcedo, thank you so much for your concern for the DAO and working to improve how it operates to protect the players involved. We really appreciate your comment.
Here’s the current indemnification clause, what edits would you make to it that would improve the clause, and any other clauses that you would recommend? We’re here to recalibrate our ideas and priorities based on community feedback
It may not be preferable to replace them, or automate those responsibilities, as it relates to them being a go-between for partners (BD, conferences, etc.) and a driver/communicator of ecosystem initiatives (marketing). Things beyond (such as core protocol and interface development, dev. tooling, and dev. relations) could be left to those with technical ability. If this is disagreeable or there are responsibilities to be mentioned which are important, let’s share.