Renewal of Compound Growth Program 2025

TL;DR

AlphaGrowth proposes the early renewal of the Compound Growth program for a tenure of 12 months.

  1. With Compound’s shift toward a further decentralization, AlphaGrowth requests a new agreement to align with the DAO’s further decentralization of the protocol. We encourage other Compound service providers to do the same.

  2. The scope of what AlphaGrowth has been responsible for handling has exceeded our original Growth Program mandates. While we’ve been running the growth program we continue to uncover new activities that are required for compliant, sustainable, DAO operation and handle quite a few outside our original purview. An increased scope has used our funding faster than expected.

  3. With the departure of key resources from Compound Labs and Labs stepping away from key responsibilities, these responsibilities fallen to the Growth Program. We need to further expand our mandate to reflect these responsibilities. You can reference an itemized list of responsibilities required to successfully run Compound curated by key Compound resources. You can request access here: we are limiting access to service providers to retain advantage over our lending competitors. If you request, please include a message with your affiliations and what you’d like to know.

Our focus will remain generating TVL, users, borrowing activity and ultimately increasing the treasury of the protocol. $710M in TVL has flown into Compound through AlphaGrowth’s initiatives to add new markets, new chains, and incentive campaigns. [DUNE Analytics] We will continue these strategies as well as dedicate personnel to DeFi operations, rails to TradFi, and hedge fund deals, as three additional channels each with the potential to bring an additional $1B in TVL to Compound Protocol.

Contents

  • TL; DR;
  • Wins
  • Why Renew Compound Growth?
  • Priorities and Plan for Growth
  • Path to a Profitable Sustainable Compound
  • Business Unit Budget Breakdown
    • Wholistic Security
    • Community
    • Expansion Units
      • New Assets & Markets
      • New Chains
      • Incentive Distribution & Structured Products
      • Treasuries as Hedge Funds
      • DeFi Operations
      • Road to TradFi
    • Budget Summary
  • Our Processes

Wins

AlphaGrowth ran a trial phase growth program from December 2023 to April 2024. Here are the details on its outcomes which include among other things launching Compound on Optimism, and securing a $3 Million grant from Arbitrum.

The trial was then rolled into a 1-year growth program. From May 2024 until today the program has the following high level achievements. [For additional details check out our latest Quarterly Report]

Quantitative Wins

We passed our 1-year milestone to acquire $500M in new TVL in the first 6 months. We added $715 Million in new TVL through AlphaGrowth initiatives. [Dune Dashboard] by WOOF!

11 New markets were added & 74 new collaterals added to markets across 57 DAO proposals.

AlphaGrowth’s impact on Compound [Dune Dashboard]

Compound deployed on the Mantle blockchain with three more blockchains are deep in the pipeline.

Incentives secured for Compound: $1M in MNT from Mantle, 200K OP from Optimism

Incentives distributed to Compound users: Systematically distributed 1.8M ARB brought $260M TVL on Arbitrum. This secured the best LTIPP program outcome for TVL return on incentives distributed at scale, and solidified a strong relationship for future Arbitrum Grants.

Here’s our analytical growth approach, which you can see reflected in the actual LTIPP performance above.

Qualitative Wins

The Growth Team also designed & commissioned the build of a decentralized frontend to help decentralize the Compound ecosystem and ensure faster iteration & product development.

V1 of the frontend designs are up and ready for beta testing, decentralized hosting is still in progress, there are two possible paths, the first is via IPFS, however IPFS has a variety of limitations our partners have discovered can be solved via another solution. Watch @Nextosi for a post coming shortly.

Over 3 days, AlphaGrowth led negotiations with Humpy over proposition 289. The AlphaGrowth team was able to attain a peaceful resolution to benefit all parties involved when faced with a classic prisoner’s dilemma. The team at Balancer was impressed that we quickly wrapped up a situation that could have dragged Compound into months or years of uncertainty. (The outcome protected the Compound Treasury from a potential $25 million loss and potentially the entire market cap of the COMP token currently valued at $837 Million)

We have facilitated numerous discussions around the possible designs for a Staked COMP token and will continue to explore and support the initiative with community support.

Through the distribution of incentives as marketing we have formed close relationships with valuable partners like:

  • Vaultcraft: Incentivized with Arbitrum LTIPP to generate $16M TVL. Currently incentivizing with another $150K with Optimism grants for lend and loop vaults
  • Contango: Distributed ****$110K Incentives for LRT loops. Additional $100K to be distributed during December 2024 and January 2025 for loops
  • dHedge: Incentivized wETH Supplies with $100K in ARB
  • OKX DeFi: Incentivized vaults that increased Compound TVL by $90M
  • Crypto[dot]com DeFi wallet: Brokered deal to add Compound vaults onto Crypto[dot]com and Trust Wallet. Incentivized with $100K split 50/50 by TrustWallet and Compound to supply OP wETH.
  • Wormhole: Co-Incentivized bridging into Arbitrum Vaults on Compound with $25K
  • Merkl: $25K in ARB used to boost APR by 2.7% on $22M TVL on Compound
  • Layer3: $25K in ARB used to incentivize social engagement and lending using compound.finance
  • Fonbnk: Incentivized underbanked in Sub-saharan Africa to open saving accounts using Compound ($10K incentives)
  • Beefy: Distributed $50K over 10 weeks to incentivize looping USDC, USDT, and wETH on Optimism.
  • Renzo: $25K OP to incentivize looping ezETH on Contango
  • Ether.Fi: Provided $100K to incentivize weETH looping
  • Lido: Received $50K Co-Incentives that were distributed to incentivize wstETH looping
  • Torque Finance: Distributed $15K to incentivize wBTC looping
  • Master Card: Pending Renewal

Constant marketing experiments have helped Compound Grow. Through our efforts so far we have generated over 53 million views and fostered partnerships that have enhanced our Compound’s reputation and outlook. Looking ahead, we’re committed to a marketing strategy that emphasizes Compound’s stability and reliability, while collaborating with reputable partners.

Why Double Down on Compound Growth Now?

  • Compound from steady state into a dynamic protocol
  • Bitcoin is nearing $100,000
  • macro trends indicate the approach of the next bull market
  • Compound needs fast-paced era of execution & partnerships.

Re-investing in the Growth Program ahead of this next wave in the market will prepare Compound to take advantage of every opportunity the Protocol is offered. (These include big traditional finance, new well funded chains, & other financial instruments) When AlphaGrowth started the Growth Program we had 14 high-value opportunities. We now have 93. We’re approached with more each day and are forced to filter out great opportunities because we’re at capacity to execute.

We have a proven track record with the DAO, and like a high-performance vehicle requires a skilled driver to navigate the path ahead, we are still uniquely equipped to steer this initiative towards success.

Priorities and Plan for Growth

Stated Priorities & Outcomes from the previous period.

Mandates Goal to increase by Actual
Total Value Locked (TVL) Expansion $500M +$750M
Market Development 8-15 11+ WETH Scroll & WBTC in pipeline
Chain Expansion 4-6 +2 with 3 in pipeline
User Acquisition 25,000 263,190
Strategic Partnerships Qualitative 10+ large partners
Infrastructure Expansions Qualitative 3 new oracles & more

we are expanding our attention to:

  • Prove out new $COMP reward strategies with the goal to drive >$100M net new TVL per $1M in COMP incentives…
  • DeFi Operations: Significantly improve COMP on-chain utility and velocity
  • Hedgefund with Treasuries: Teaching external treasury partners why to include Compound in their treasury management strategy:
  • Building Rails to TradFi: Build pathways for large non-crypto native institutions to use Compound in their trading strategies. With the goal that three organizations with the potential to deposit $1B on Compound and greater than $10B in Assets under management will be privately auditing Compound by the end of the year as a safe location to deposit their funds.

Budget Request Breakdown by Business Unit

Our budget ask is neatly segmented into eight essential business units, each crafted to bolster various facets of Compound’s growth and operations.

  1. Wholistic Security
  2. Community
  3. New Assets & Markets
  4. New Chains
  5. Incentive Distribution & Structured Products
  6. Treasuries as Hedge Funds
  7. DeFi Operations
  8. Road to TradFi

And three working capital buckets.

  1. Marketing Budget
  2. Grant Budget for Builders
  3. COMP Incentives to distribute

Let’s dive into the details:

Wholistic Security

Thesis:

Compound’s reputation hinges on the security of its assets and governance. With over $2.7B in funds, we must ensure the protocol remains the safest place for whales and institutions. Risks like bankruptcy, legal issues, governance takeovers, or frontend exploits threaten the protocol’s viability. With Compound Labs’ reduced involvement, remaining service providers must increase their responsibilities and remain vigilant about their compliance to financial regulations and legal obligations to maintain Compound’s continued success.

Main Activities:

  • Financial
    • Hire a fractional CFO whose responsibilities are:
      • Remain compliant & handle funds (Incentives, partnerships, etc …)
      • Help partners provide liquidity loans on/to Compound
      • Maintain Growth Program accounting
  • Legal
    • Hire a fractional Lawyer whose responsibilities are:
      • Advise the team to take actions that are believed to be legally compliant.
      • Review partner contracts before signing, for i.e.: Mantle
  • Security
    • Hire a fractional CSO whose responsibilities are:
      • Security vendor management
      • Provide team members with best practices against getting Phished or hacked
      • Protect social accounts from getting hacked
  • Website Frontend Operations
    • Continuous improvement and development on the Frontend website.
    • Continuous improvement on decentralized hosting standards & security.
    • Fund PRC node providers for the decentralized frontend. Compound Labs currently pays $20-25K/month for the 100M+ daily requests to RPC nodes via compound.finance

Business Unit Annual Cost: 20,650 COMP

Community

Thesis:

Blockchain companies cannot grow successfully without partners, community members, and a strong userbase. The following community team is designed to acknowledge and understand how Compound Protocol can help anyone who reaches out for help, partnership, etc … While the growth program has a backlog of large initiatives, everyone in the community deserves to be heard and helped. This team will also interact with community members of tangential communities like the chains on which we’re deployed to make sure Compound takes full advantage of the grant & partnership opportunities available (and that we qualify as strong supporters of those communities).

Main Activities:

  • Community Support: Technical developer with Compound ABI & frontend knowledge to help users in difficult situations
  • Receive Grants: Write grant applications & lobby the correct delegates in different ecosystems (for example lobbying in Arbitrum has brought in $3M in grants so far)
  • Governance Participation: Read governance posts & respond with opinions in the best interest of the community
  • Identify talent like the Compound DAO’s CTO that will better the ecosystem
  • Content writing for Marketing & Forum initiatives

Business Unit Annual Cost: 19,000 COMP

Expansion Business Units

Expansion units are constructed as sales teams, with seasoned sales leaders with access to capital, partnerships & relationships in the blockchain space.

New Assets & Markets

Thesis:

Researching highly desirable assets and market constructions, can lead to large inflows of TVL with minimal programming and product expansion. For example, comparing Compound to competitors showed that USDT markets on competitors were a great opportunity for expansion. When Compound added USDT on Mainnet it drew $200M in TVL with little to no marketing.

Past Performance:

  • USDT on Mainnet: brought $200M TVL with little to no marketing

Main Activities:

  • Lending Markets competitive analysis
  • New asset research: speaking with asset teams and their investors
  • New asset listing operations
  • New market construction
  • Pushing to increase leverage on isolated markets
  • Pushing to create markets for higher risk/centralized assets like Paxos Gold.

Goal:

  • Add $500M in TVL to Compound by adding new collateral assets and markets to existing chains on which Compound is deployed.

Business Unit Annual Cost: 9,200 COMP

New Chains

Thesis:

Compound can expand to multiple blockchains and receive incentives from each. Each new expansion is an opportunity to increase Compound’s footprint with a new Community, new investors both institutional and commercial, and co-market into new regions alongside the blockchain.

Past Performance:

  • Arbitrum, received $3M in Grant incentives distributed for free Ad Budget.
  • OP, received $600K in Grants to distribute for Marketing Compound
  • Mantle
    • Received $1M in Grant incentives & marketing support
    • Carry Trade Negotiated to benefit Mantle Treasury

Main Activities:

  • Research which blockchains can work with Compound
  • Generate deals that make it possible for Blockchains to increase their TVL to work with Compound. Treasury deals, Atomic Liquidation from Treasury, etc …
  • Work with ecosystem projects on roadmap chains to get TVL guarantees to increase certainty that new deployments get to profitability/sustainability
  • Negotiate deployment contracts, map chain needs, desires, & decision makers.
  • Accounts receivable, make sure chains keep their word & distribute promised incentives & liquidity loans.

Current Expectations & Roadmap:

  • Linea, Ronin, Ape Chain

Goal:

  • Add 4-6 blockchains to Compound over the next year that are structured to be revenue positive for the DAO, either through treasury deals like that being negotiated with Celo, or through reserve growth from sufficient TVL growth & utilization.

Business Unit Annual Cost: 12,300 COMP

Incentive Distribution & Structured Products

Thesis:

  • We can use

Past Performance:

  • Arbitrum: brought $260M in TVL
  • Mantle: Partnerships built with 4 large CEXs ready to distribute incentives when ready
  • Meaningful partnerships created: OKX, Vaultcraft, TrustWallet, ByBit, Binance,

Main Activities:

  • Distribute partner chain incentives → Replicate LTIPP successes with growth strategies
  • Working with structured product partners to create & execute incentive marketing campaigns.
  • Experiment distributing COMP with growth strategies to gauge its effectiveness
  • Optimizing the Compound Decentralized Frontend for incentive distribution.
  • Pushing new Compound reward contracts. V2, V3.
  • Profitability analysis: Working with Gauntlet to collectively apply experimental results to increase COMP reward distribution methods.
  • Design and promote new structured products with sustainable incentive sources, which extend beyond growth campaigns.

Images

  • Slide showing how we distribute incentives per week, to prevent mercenary capital

Goal:

  • Bring $1B in new TVL to Compound through incentive programs distributing tokens from partner blockchains as well as COMP token. Given this renewal the Incentive team will have $2 million in starting incentives to distribute $1M from Mantle & $1M in COMP, further incentives will be negotiated by the New Chains team & managed by the incentives team.

Business Unit Annual Cost: 11,600 COMP

Treasuries as Hedgefunds

Thesis:

Treasuries have $0 carry for their own native asset, nullified by diminishing returns and limited liquidity. Putting assets to work creates yield-bearing token sinks, that net diversification of treasury assets, significantly raising their real value, and replacing potential sell-pressure with potential buy-pressure.

Past Performance:

  • New area of the team, but with robust partnerships in all areas of DeFi

Main Activities:

  • Teaching external treasury partners how they can get returns for their DAO/Foundation/ecosystem with strategies that involve depositing treasury funds into Compound.
  • Using treasury activities to facilitate growth to the Compound app and ecosystem
  • Managing liquidity deals and vault strategies
  • Liquidity and risk analysis for negotiating deals in conjunction with Gauntlet
  • Reporting on treasury deal performance, composition, and active positions to Compound delegates
  • Potentially involve Compound Treasury assets in these deals when the risk-adjusted return for the treasury justifies involvement.

Current Expectations & Roadmap:

  • Structure and execute deals that net fees, incentives, and possibly fixed income to partner treasuries & possibly the Comp treasury.
  • Spot liquidity deals that net both fees and incentives to the treasury

Goal:

  • Increase TVL in Compound markets from DAO Treasuries
  • Raise the carry of the Treasury by 50%+

Business Unit Annual Cost: 11,700 COMP

DeFi Operations

Thesis:

Through better DeFi Operations and integrations, demand and utility for the COMP token will grow, while circulating supplies sink. This will help facilitate a flywheel that grows the Treasury, TVL, and inbound dealflow.

Main Activities:

  • Design new potential utility for the COMP token, such as stakedCOMP
  • Negotiate and underwrite equitable liquidity deals
  • Strategically time new listings and incentives to best facilitate token velocity
  • Integrate with bridges and perps markets
  • Create new opportunities for COMP as collateral for stable coins and other CDPs
  • Facilitate partnerships that lead to unique dealflow such as carry-trades, that lead to both velocity and TVL growth
  • Portfolio management/reporting for all operations

Current Expectations & Roadmap:

  • Pools on 5+ chains
  • Priority partnerships with top bridge partners
  • New positions for COMP as collateral in prestigious DeFi applications

Goal:

  • Grow the COMP Treasury
  • Significantly improve COMP on-chain velocity
  • Significantly improve COMP on-chain utility

Business Unit Annual Cost: 11,900 COMP

Road to TradFi

Thesis:

We believe the largest market opportunity for Compound lies in creating a bridge between traditional finance and crypto platforms to attract significant institutional capital to the platform. We have multiple direct forms of confirmed interest from TradFi partners who have serious interest in placing billions of dollars into crypto-backed fixed income solutions, but scalability and trust are current challenges. Developing independent, trusted relationships with institutional players and integrating scalable solutions over the next 2–3 years will be essential in achieving this goal. Crypto remains a niche market compared to TradFi, with the latter requiring rigorous audits, custodian relationships, and risk mitigations to transition into crypto-backed instruments.

Past Performance:

Existing relationships include connections with CoinFund and other market makers interested in fixed income products for Ethereum ETFs. While no substantial TradFi investments have been secured, previous engagements at conferences, like the Padfi Fixed Income event, demonstrated strong institutional interest in exploring opportunities.

Current Expectations & Roadmap:

The immediate goal is to establish foundational relationships and technical infrastructure to facilitate TradFi involvement. Over the next 12 months, milestones include initiating the first technical audit and securing three partnerships with funds managing over $10 billion, with the potential to deposit substantial capital onto crypto platforms. Progress will involve deepening relationships with 50 TradFi institutions, leveraging both technical and interpersonal strategies.

Main Activities:

  • Architecting the process flow for onboarding TradFi capital, including fiat-to-crypto conversion, custodial relationships, and counterparty governance.
  • Identifying and collaborating with reputable OTC desks, market makers (e.g., GSR, Wintermute), and custodians (e.g., Fireblocks, Qredo).
  • Conducting security and technical analyses to address institutional requirements for trust and risk management.
  • Building personal relationships and fostering trust with TradFi stakeholders to overcome existing barriers.
  • Assisting TradFi teams to hire and structure in house engineering teams to audit and validate technical platforms.

Goal:

To lay the groundwork for institutional participation by establishing trust, technical readiness, and strategic partnerships. By the end of 12 months, have three high-profile partnerships with firms able to deposit at least $1B into Compound, an active audit process, and tangible progress toward long-term adoption of crypto-backed fixed income solutions by TradFi players.

Business Unit Annual Cost: 11,700 COMP

Working Capital

Marketing Fund

Our marketing fund will remain the same as the previous period. We have allocated 1542 COMP/month to drive demand through dynamic events and campaigns highlighting new integrations and deployments within the Compound ecosystem.

What is Important:

  • Wholistic Security: AlphaGrowth is able to operate with maximum safety by delegating access to team members without allowing them to directly log into Compound associated accounts.

  • Brand Positioning: Compound is a critical piece of DeFi infrastructure. As such it has generated its highest engagements from Comarketing with reputable brands.

  • Community Growth: Collaborate with voices that connect with the community to inspire community involvement

For more information on how AlphaGrowth views marketing for Compound, please read this document which will soon be adapted to the forum before EOY.

What are we measuring:

Post Quantity: 545

Post Views: 54,000,000

Post Engagements: 390,000

Notable Engagements:

  • Chains: Optimism, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle.

  • Structure Products: OKX, VaultCraft, Contango, Cian, dHedge, Merkl.

  • Key Thought Leaders of DeFi:

Community Mentions: 400% Growth in past 30 days

User and TVL Growth:

+500% Unique Address Growth


Integration Grants Fund

Our Integration fund will remain the same as the previous phase of the Growth Program (Phase 2). Set at 1542 COMP/month, it will focus on expediting development and funding strategic initiatives that enhance Compound’s infrastructure and capabilities. To build up on this, we are now solidifying the requirement for an Integrations fund to swiftly fund strategic initiatives that otherwise would not be funded due to multiple limitations. (like CGP ceiling of $50K for Grants)

Past performance: The previous period’s integration fund was used to augment Compound Protocol by funding the following technical development (programming) initiatives:

  • Optimism deployment
  • Mantle development & deployment which helped secure a $1M MNT grant for Compound.
  • Increasing comet collateral capacity to 24 assets
  • 4626 wrapper development and deployment
  • RewardsV2.scope is under audit.
  • LTIPP Execution
  • Decentralized Front End.
  • LST and LRT adjustments

And more, including the following in progress:

Position Migrator. The migrator initiative was inspired by the first migrator, which lacked functionality. The new version of the migrator will support the migration of the positions from AAVE V3, Spark, and Morpho and cover all the markets and chains. Also, the migrator will support collateral swap in case the Compound market does not support it. The migrator functionality will be integrated into the new Frontend interface.

COMP Incentives

Our goal is to test & prove the effectiveness of new distribution methods and Channels for COMP incentives that will drive sticky TVL onto the protocol. Our goal is to work collaboratively with Gauntlet and share what we find such that the $10M/year they distribute can be used in the most effective way possible. We seek the ability to distribute 1542 COMP in order to measure its effectiveness on the Market. (An amount equivalent to the marketing budget) This responsibility would be handled by the Incentives team who has already acquired and distributed millions on behalf of the protocol. The APR incentives will have the flexibility to be tested across all Compound’s existing chains whereas new chain deployment incentives can only be used to benefit the chain from which they were granted.

Past performance:
AlphaGrowth has set a precedent managing the distribution of $1M of ARB incentives which brought $260M TVL onto Compound. We are currently in charge of distributing ~$1M OP on Optimism, and $1M MNT on Mantle to start soon.

5 Likes

Summary

Business Units

Business Unit Monthly (COMP) Annual (COMP) Win
Wholistic Security 1721 20650 Compliance & Safety
New Assets & Markets 767 9200 +$1B TVL
New Chains 1025 12300 +$1B TVL
Incentive Distribution & Structured Products 967 11600 +$1B TVL
Treasuries as Hedgefunds 975 11700 +$1B TVL
DeFi Operations 992 11900 +$1B TVL
Rails to TradFi 975 11700 +$1B TVL
Community Support 1583 19000 Active Participation & Confidence
108050 Total

Working Capital

Marketing Budget Monthly (COMP) Annual (COMP) Business unit in charge
Marketing Budget 1542 18504 New Chains
Grant Budget for Builders 1542 18504 Community & Wholistic Security
COMP Incentives to distribute 1542 18504 Incentive Distribution
55512 Total

Commission Structure

The most transparent KPI on which AlphaGrowth can be judged is the TVL the strategies we deploy bring to Compound. Already $715M in TVL has been added to Compound into markets and collateral opportunities that would not exist without the Compound Growth Program. The business units we’ve outlined above are each designed to drive relationships that result in additional TVL. As such, to drive peak performance of AlphaGrowth team members, AlphaGrowth will receive a $5 million bonus for every additional $1 billion in TVL brought to the Compound platform that can be attributed to AlphaGrowth initiatives without which the deposits would not be possible. The starting TVL will be set the day this contract executes and the arrangement will continue until AlphaGrowths relationship with Compound has been terminated.

Use of Funds

For funds allocated as Working Capital; AlphaGrowth will conduct a Post-program audit to list out all the expenses incurred and activities associated with these categories. Any unspent funds assigned to these Categories will be returned back to the Compound Treasury at the end of the time period of the program.

Entity Update & Indemnification

For legal reasons, AlphaGrowth’s legal entity has become Aquifer DAO doing business as AlphaGrowth. Indemnification and Waiver

To ensure AlphaGrowth can fulfill its responsibilities while managing risks associated with its role, upon passage of this proposal, the DAO will indemnify and hold harmless AlphaGrowth for all actions arising from its duties under this proposal.

However, the following indemnification and waiver provisions do not cover claims or other legal actions arising from AlphaGrowth’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.

The DAO agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless AlphaGrowth, its affiliates, officers, directors, employees, agents, and representatives from any and all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys’ fees arising out of:

  • Actions, decisions, or omissions, whether through intent or negligence, by AlphaGrowth, its officers, employees, or agents while performing services authorized through the adoption of the Compound Growth proposal.
  • Third-party claims, demands, or liabilities arising from AlphaGrowth’s execution of its authorized obligations, including governance, operations, or protocol risks directed or approved by the DAO or its working groups.
  • Any claim, liability, or proceeding involving an AlphaGrowth officer, employee, or agent solely because of their status as a member of the DAO or holder of Compound governance tokens.

The DAO and its members, including token holders, delegates, and affiliates, irrevocably waive, release, and discharge any claims against AlphaGrowth and its representatives for actions taken under prior or current DAO proposals. This waiver is binding on the DAO and its members and is intended to shield AlphaGrowth from retrospective claims.

If any claim, demand, or legal action arises that is subject to indemnification under this provision, AlphaGrowth retains the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to control and direct its defense, settlement negotiations, and the resolution of the matter at the DAO’s expense. The DAO and its members agree to cooperate fully with AlphaGrowth in asserting any defenses or counterclaims as requested. The DAO may not impose nonmonetary settlement terms upon AlphaGrowth without the consent of its owners.

If a court, or any other authority, determines that the DAO cannot indemnify AlphaGrowth, DAO members collectively and individually, in consideration for the services provided by AlphaGrowth and upon passage of this proposal, agree to assume joint and several liability to cover all losses related actions otherwise subject to indemnification under this section.

Nothing in this proposal shall be construed to mean AlphaGrowth owes the DAO any fiduciary duties. However, AlphaGrowth will execute the terms of this proposal diligently in the spirit of good faith and fair dealing.

Impact and Transparency

To align incentives for AlphaGrowth to go above and beyond. At the end of this 12-month engagement AlphaGrowth will propose a performance bonus to be voted on by the Compound Community. This bonus will also be a signal for AlphaGrowth to proceed and take on further responsibility within the Compound ecosystem.

At AlphaGrowth, we like doing business in public. To keep the community informed on the progress and ensure transparency, AlphaGrowth will provide:

  • Monthly reports on the progress of BD activities (12 reports)
  • Quarterly Progress reports highlighting various deals in the pipeline, successful integrations, closed deals and learnings (4 reports)
  • A database that gives all the program specific information to the community so that the members can come, verify and inquire about the process.
  • Post program analysis and report about spends on Working Capital

We welcome any input or feedback from the Compound community on our proposal.

Our Process

You can view more on our operational processes here in our previous proposal.

Next Steps

We’ve been circulating our re-election draft among delegates since November 26th, now it’s time to:

  1. Engage with the community and Compound service provides to refine our proposal publicly
  2. Elevate the proposal to be voted on by the DAO
  3. Let growth initiatives begin

Delegate Q&A

Delegate Question #1:

Can you please expand more on your current remaining funds and their relevant segments from your ongoing tenure? You are requesting an early renewal but there are little details regarding the actual numbers and capital shortfall.

Answer #1:Current use of funds & shortfall

The Compound Growth Team was entrusted with 1542 COMP per month to cover marketing and an additional 1542 COMP to cover developer grants (37,008 COMP). At the time the Growth program was awarded the COMP token was valued at $63.84 making the annual budget for each bucket worth $1.18M. However the mean price of the token over which funds were deployed was $45, reducing the effective buying power of each budget to $832K.

The Humpy situation also had a significant impact on the service portion of our agreement from which we pay for team salaries. The uncertainty around whether delegates would opt to fork COMP and send the COMP token price to zero, forced AlphaGrowth to sell a significant amount of the COMP below market price, to ensure we would be able to cover payroll for the remainder of the contract without firing team members. This was not a decision we took lightly, but we gave our word to run the program for a year, which would have been impossible if our payroll capital was wiped to zero. We eventually retook our treasury holdings in COMP token, but similar to startups experiencing financial loss around the uncertainty of SVB’s failing, we experienced a similar reduction in the size of our growth program treasury.

The expenses below outline everything on which we’ve spent the Growth Program’s working capital.

Total spending USD: $617,551 + $951,945 = $1,569,496

Total spending COMP: $1,569,496 / $45 (avg price of comp while spent) = 34,887 COMP

Remaining COMP: 2121

Remaining Budget in USD: $229,068

Ongoing Marketing Fund Projects$150,000 has been committed to Master Card for Compound to be included in their interface so users can spend cTokens effectively using Compound as their savings account. This $150,000 has not been distributed yet. At today’s price of COMP it can be covered, however, if the price of COMP falls below $71 before distribution this integration will exhaust the remainder of our working capital.

Additional grant & marketing infrastructure being pushed include the following as well. If the price of COMP continues to rise we’ll be able to cover more of these, however if the price remains or falls, we’ll need additional grant funding to execute them.

Project Category Committed
Decentralised Hosting Maintenance ½ grant ½ marketing $126K/yr
Cross Chain Liquidity Layer Vaults ½ grant ½ marketing $160K
Frontend Maintenance Grant $160K/yr

Delegate Question #2:

We’d like to see an increased focus on also driving the demand/borrow side on Compound. While TVL has grown there hasn’t been a significant increase in borrows and it is underperforming when comparing Compound to Aave and Morpho. We don’t see the point in artificially inflating deposits with rewards when there is little demand on the borrowing side.

Regarding compensation numbers: At first glance the budget has doubled from the current engagement largely driven by new ‘business units’. The increase is expected given greater responsibilities and additional scope but I have some comments about the overall structure and need for some business units:

Answer #2:

You’re right, we haven’t seen borrows increase. This directly relates to Collateral Factors on Compound. Our team member Bryan has written an article comparing Compound to Aave to addressed here:Collateral Factors: How to Win the Lending Race

We at AlphaGrowth are all-in for increasing collateral factors to give investors an equivalent amount of loops as they can receive on Aave, until then borrowers will flow to where there is greater utility for their collateral. Risk management is the party against doing so. We will keep petitioning risk management on this front, we could use the community’s help doing the same. In the meantime that’s why we’re pursuing new strategies with the additional sales teams you see, like “Rails to Trad.Fi” who have reasons to borrow other than maximizing leverage. And “Structured Products” to create tools like fixed-interest loans on Compound that address needs for new types of borrowers.


Delegate Question #3:

Please breakdown and justify each business unit:

Answer #3:

On the cost of each business unit, I’ve included a breakdown of how we constructed our budget here. This document is private, we are happy to provide access to active delegates upon request.


Delegate Question #4:

Wholistic Security: Outside Legal, what is being delivered under this business unit, and will you please justify its costs? We already have OpenZeppelin delivering audits and transparent accounting should naturally be a part of your engagement with the DAO.

Answer #4: Wholistic Security

With new responsibilities comes new risks. AlphaGrowth needed General Counsel to continue its engagement and is single the biggest expense at $30K/month retainer.

The next largest expense is Frontend uptime, This includes $240,000 to assume the RPC node bill of the Compound website when the decentralized version is ready to replace compound.finance. The goal would be to handle the traffic and requests and support the full functionality of the compound protocol website. The online footprint that the Growth team has the responsibility for is growing. Building, Incentivizing & Protecting the protocol resources. The Protocol needs a dedicated CSO. The other pieces of security were the time spent across trusted team members to coordinate, review & execute large fund transfers to partners. And vendor management of smaller security partners.

The final section is Finance. we don’t hire the best in blockchain …. we hire the best, which means that some team members haven’t handled their accounting in tokens, or understand their liability if they take actions with tokens on behalf of Compound initiatives. It’s not a large expense in comparison to others, Finance section is necessary.

The majority of the financial expense section revolves around the increased security & compliance needed when signing on behalf of Compound to manage millions on behalf of partners like Mantle, hedge-funds, etc … and setting up the correct systems to do so.


Delegate Question #5:

Community: I don’t think the DAO should be paying for service provider governance participation and content writing for marketing should fall within the marketing budget. We are fine with the procuring grants part and would like to see this kept as is with the current “grant consultation” item.

Answer #5: Community

We can remove talking heads from the budget; in that case, would love to hear, the other ideas for solving this problem of every opening for discussion in community calls being met with dead silence (Because most service providers are afraid of accidentally saying something stupid)

We will keep grant writing in the marketing budget, still would like to give whoever takes over to spend 100% of their time on it, as there’s so much we could have gone after in free grants, programs, etc … and we were limited by time & capacity. If you look and say “a writer doesn’t get paid that much” they’re actually a DAO sales expert, writing is just the main channel, and their returns to the DAO more than justify the expenditure.

DevRel would be two people to provide around the sun support. These are highly technical people who understand the Compound ABI and are highly available.


Delegate Question #6:

Treasuries as Hedge funds: This section needs concrete goals to justify its costs.

Answer #6: Treasuries as Hedge funds:

The budget for, “treasuries as hedge funds" is a dedicated sales team that is entirely focused on closing deals with DAOs & foundation treasuries. The treasury team will help manage and strategies by partially (or fully) depositing it onto Compound. The goal here is to get incredibly sticky long term TVL on Compound that is the opposite of using incentives to attract sharks our term for short term investors.

The overall goal is to see if this strategy can directly increase TVL on Compound by $1B through deals that are struck with treasuries, which should increase compound reserves by an additional $5M per year that the funds are deposited.

More granular goals could be the number of foundations that have deals with Compound (1 x $1B, 10 x $100M, 10 x $50M). We could openly track how many deals have been signed, executed, and deposits made over the course of the year.

https://defillama.com/treasuries

Here is example language the sales team will use on treasuries (written as though speaking to the COMP treasury managers)

Currently the COMP Treasury has 1,108,492 COMP, valued theoretically at $119M, but most of which has a $0 carry through liquidity depth and diminishing returns. Strategic deployments of COMP that return other assets to the treasury replace potential sell-pressure with potential buy-pressure, and the ability to continue operations with the selling of non-COMP assets. In addition to the important resulting diversification it should be both revenue generating and used to assist with deal-flow and partnerships, helping facilitate the growth of Compound in markets, deployments, users, liquidity, and of course further revenue.

Our north star working with your treasury will be the revenue in non-COMP assets the strategies we help you execute add to your treasury.

During our negotiation with one particular chain we realized the end game of most treasuries should be to be a hedge fund. Our aim will be to educate and create strategies specifically for treasuries to take advantage of the Compound protocol to its fullest.


Delegate Question #7:

For Treasuries as Hedge funds, we’d prefer compensation for this to be structured on deliverables and KPIs.

Answer #7:

There needs to be an initial budget to hire the team to execute this strategy, it’s not realistic or feasible to find high quality talent willing to work on pure commission on to sell products with 6 month sales cycles. Whether or not the strategy shows signs of potential or has experienced any successes should factor into whether it’s funded during the next re-election.


Delegate Question #8:

For DeFi Operations:

  1. I would like stricter KPIs here and cost justifications

  2. What does “pools on 5+ chains mean”?

  3. In general, I’m not a huge fan of bridging pools as a use case for COMP

    1. 1) Because of security risks and 2) Most widely used bridging protocols use intent-based architecture which does not really require pools.

Answer #8: DeFi Operations:

DeFi Operations consists of 2 parts Token Listings & Token Health.

The implementation is a sales & operations team whose only focus is to close and implement partnerships that increase the utility of the COMP token. These include providing leadership to Staked COMP, increasing COMPs presence across all of crypto.

It is the belief system of the Growth Program that there are 7 things that generate fees in crypto.

  1. Staking

  2. CDPs

  3. Money Markets

  4. Dexes

  5. Perps

  6. Bridges

  7. Interest Rate Swaps

The Goal of DeFi Operations is to make each of these primitives a sustainable and fiscally responsible partnership for the DAO. Either through Grants, Incentives, Liquidity Deals, Tokenswaps or Fiscal Mechanism Design DeFi Operations can sustain the DAO thru bull and bear.

Let’s look at Dexes for example, the COMP token itself has incredibly thin DEX liquidity. But we can increase Token Velocity to Increase Token Health.

Velocity is a measurement of the health of a token. Right now tokens like Aave have 10x the DeFi volume as Compound which leads to better token health.

COMP → $4M 24 hour volume on DEXs

Aave → $38M 24 hour volume on DEXs

Faster and better bridges are absolutely imperative as they lead to greater utility and velocity. For example in DeFi Ops we specifically plan to integrate COMP with the ACROSS bridge, in a manner which generates revenue for the DAO, and unlocks significant utility on-chain.

Additionally, custom vault strategies developed by the DeFi Ops team enable the closing of more robust and complex deals for the ‘Treasuries as Hedge funds’ team, so that other DAOs liquidity can be hypothecated strategically through Compound, directly raising our TVL.

Additional KPIs that can be measured and benefit from proper DeFi Operations include

  1. % of on-chain liquidity growth in DEXs, Perps, Bridges, Etc for the COMP token

  2. % of on-chain velocity growth for the COMP token

  3. DAO revenue generated from DeFi positions & partnerships established

  4. DAO-to-DAO deals secured by DeFi Ops custom vault solutions

This also leads to more marketing opportunities, partnerships, and fuels further inbound requests and deal flow.

Summary Notes: There are 2 cycles of business life: Fast growth, or slow death. Inactivity and cost minimization is slow death. We want to grow revenue, market share, users, usage, and more. Don’t settle for 2nd best and declining.

8 Likes

Big proposal, too big all at oncee

I find it hard to stomach a $16 million dollar request in one vote

Recommend splitting up the vote into a vote per budget request. There are some I agree with and some I dont

2 Likes

Thank you for your objection @mexilc

On this day this proposal draft started circulating between community members the price of COMP was $50. The USD equivalent of the proposal at that time was $8.1 budget. $5.4M for 1 year of staffing & $2.7M of working capital (marketing, grants, COMP incentives).

The price of COMP today doubles that USD equivalent and is trending downward from the highest price it’s reached in the last 2.5 years. If you look historically, the average price of COMP over the last 2 years has hovered around $50. While speculation may be on the side of the community today, the teams that are dedicating their undivided attention to securing the protocols future should be capitalized to carry out the plans necessary for success over a year in an uncertain market. For example, the last growth program budget was approved when the price of COMP was $63, and the majority of the funds were spent when COMP was $45 leading to the situation we are in today.

We are one of few Compound service providers paid in COMP token rather than stablecoins. We hold our treasury in COMP until the amount that is needed to pay payroll is converted to the currency required for payment (so team members can pay their rent) on a monthly basis. For external payments, grants are paid in COMP tokens as well, the growth program treasury remains bought into the long term success of the protocol throughout our tenure.

With that perspective, we are interested to hear your thoughts.

Beyond price, we would appreciate your feedback on the extent to which you support each piece of the plan to execute the growth program. If you think sections should be broken out, please let us know which ones and why, we’re happy to discuss it.

1 Like

I support this proposal as an initiative of AlphaGrowth an Aquifer DAO Company

5 Likes

Specifically, what would you like to include which is not included already?

AG have themselves pushed for greater responsibility through initiatives such as the decentralized frontend project and other examples. We should be clear about scope increases related to AG’s own doings in relation to that which would be natural in DAO operations.

I’ve seen the notes in the first delegate Q&A above related to expenses, but do not see which line items have been identified as the ones causing scope increase. I guess it is related to the exploratory projects promoted by AG and would appreciate confirmation.

Looking forward to your clarity! :ringer_planet::vulcan_salute::boom:

@cmrn

What’s included in aligning with the DAOs further decentralization?

Helping explore and bring options to the DAO in terms of foundation and entity options. And helping acquire brand assets for the DAO.

AlphaGrowth has pushed for its own scope increase by pushing initiatives like the decentralized frontend?

Yes, we have pushed and increased the scope of the initiatives because they needed to be done, and we were in a position to act and solve a glaring problem in the ecosystem. In the course of marketing Compound, we’ve come across multiple roadblocks that prevent effective marketing. One of these roadblocks is our inability to update the compound.finance website to include landing pages and other foundational elements needed to optimize marketing spend. The decentralized frontend solves those foundational marketing problems with an added benefit of increasing community involvement in the website. Compound must have the ability to evolve.

We have additionally worked with all the DAO service providers who serve Compound to amass the list of responsibilities required to run Compound smoothly, and we’ve assigned those responsibilities that were previously overseen by inactive parties across parties that are still actively contributing to Compound. We’re happy to have a call with you and any other community members who would like to discuss them.

Which of these projects have led to an accelerated use of AlphaGrowth’s Funding?

Great question, Yes, some of the larger projects that were not initially anticipated were

  1. The strategic token modeling consultants & time spent post proposition 289 to set a clear potential design for staked COMP
  2. The expenses around the decentralized frontend, we built one-off landing pages for each partner campaign until it became a large recurring problem that needed a scalable solution.
  3. The deal to partner with Linea, MetaMask & Mastercard while in our purview has a larger budget that consumes multiple months of marketing spend for a single campaign, and we believe will be well worth the investment.
  4. The time and money involved in operationalizing incentive distributions and matching grants.
1 Like

I’d like to express gratitude to the AG team for the swift response.

A great point and there was significant effort there from AG’s side. Respect.

My position was stated above, so will give room for others to comment.

Pretty awesome. The DAO shouldn’t have any issue in supporting it. We should consider all paths to resolution and can move mountains as long as the community has the information.

Hmm. Ok. Thank you for detailing :pray:

4 Likes

It doenst matter what past price performance looked like, the vote is now and the price is over $100.

There are no basis for estimates regarding why each section needs the COMP requested.

DeFi Operations: 11,900 COMP (or $1,190,000) is based on what? How many people?

I dont think it is unrealistic for DAO voters to know what the spend profile looks like and how much of the request is going to AG margin.

Dont even get me started on the performance bonus section

As of today AlphaGrowth has added $820M in TVL, we have new 4 chains lined up to be added in 2025 and much more to come. We’ve been around long enough to know it’s not cheap to find the personnel and assets to execute well in the space. Happy to walk through the processes step-by-step that make these results possible. We’ve set up a time for open office hours this Monday at 3-4pm EST. We encourage all Compound community members with questions to come and participate in the discussion. meet.google.com/wzg-arpw-bya

2 Likes

AlphaGrowth is requesting an egregious sum of 163,562 COMP ($18 million) equivalent to around 13% of DAO total treasury for ONLY 1 year of work!!

Unfortunately more TVL doesn’t proportionally equal to more revenue generated for the DAO, especially when the supplied assets are mere collaterals. What is the increase in fees generated to DAO by AlphaGrowth? since that is the metric to measure success for DAO!

Compound Vendor Payment Vault by Area is now used to pay Compound vendors (OZ,Gauntlet).So why did AG not choose this streaming option in USD but instead requesting full prepayment of work in COMP where the DAO will have no option for assessment & recall?

Asking payment in COMP is detrimental to the DAO during bull market, as token price tends to appreciate over time and vendor typically pockets any surplus appreciation.

As a holder of COMP, I worry the about this vender’s heightened appetite, charging high fees without clear benefits, in terms of income for the DAO.

Appreciate the feedback.
After 1 year from inception the Growth Program has added 848MM in TVL seen here: https://dune.com/queries/4224634/7107263
With well balanced utilization and collateral factors controls this can be optimized to generate ~1% in reserves per year or $8MM.

We believe that we will generate 2-6 Billion TVL over the next year with optimized controls can generate 20-60MM for the reserves. While reserves don’t 100% match to treasury growth, the growth program is exploring solutions to drive further alignment with reserves and treasury.

As for payment in COMP vs USD, Pricing in COMP we believe long term aligns more with the DAO than pricing in USD. We believe our efforts will have a greater positive impact than our cost.

We are excited to drive long term growth and value to Compound DAO

Usually more legal issues with paying in stables.

On behalf of Beefy, I wanted to express our full support for AlphaGrowth’s proposal, and to give a testimonial about our experiences working together to grow Compound.

Beefy has been deploying autocompounding vaults on top of Compound for over a year now, with upwards of a dozen products and typically between $20-30M of total value locked at any given time. This includes working with other protocols like Mai Finance to deliver secure yield on their collateral deposits through Beefy and Compound. We’d been trying to build a relationship with Compound for a while after we first deployed to co-market and distribute our efforts, but had found it difficult to breakthrough the decentralisation to the people who can really get things done.

We met AlphaGrowth at Token2049 Singapore and were immediately impressed. The team are serious operators, always shooting for large initiatives with smart strategic thinking and a ton of ambition. They’re also a great bunch to deal with, keen to help partners out and make things happen, without any of the politics or BS you can sometimes find among professional DAO service providers. Once we realised that Beefy and Compound (via AG) were targetting a bunch of similar chains and incentive schemes, we agreed it makes sense to buddy up.

Since that time, we’ve been collaborating with AG to run a 10-week campaign (5 week initial + 5 week extension) targeting OP Mainnet with grant-funded incentives. The campaign included various co-marketing efforts, fresh materials and an AMA. The effort succeeded in generating an incremental $17M of supply-side TVL across our collective audience, in addition to our existing presence. We’re also exploring a number of other opportunities for the future, where Beefy and Compound neighbour one another in different ecosystems.

Working with AlphaGrowth has been a great experience, and we’re pleased to vouch for the fantastic service they deliver. It’s clear to us that their incentive model - as medium-term external service providers under constant scrutiny from the DAO - produces strong motivations to create value. And as more and more bullish sentiments take hold, the next 12 months will likely be defined not just by excellent technology, but by the teams who can operate and market themselves the best. We have every faith in AG to maximise Compound’s opportunities for growth.

We hope we can continue working together to grow Compound for a long, long time :handshake:

6 Likes

At Contango, we’re thrilled to continue working with the amazing Alphagrowth team! Their efforts in promoting and scaling Compound markets have been nothing short of outstanding.

Our collaboration has yielded exceptional results for both Compound and Contango. For instance, Alphagrowth’s initiative to incentivize Compound’s Arbitrum markets with $ARB achieved a remarkable 930x ROI and resulted in sticky TVL, as detailed in this post.

We’re excited about the potential renewal of the Compound growth program and look forward to building on this momentum together!

4 Likes

On behalf of RedStone we are excited to continue working with AlphaGrowth as they have clearly demonstrated the ability and drive to grow the Compound protocol and it’s TVL.
When it comes to the execution of the Growth Program goals, whenever there are needs to deploy the protocol on new chains as well as to add new assets, we are here to help.

6 Likes

As Sky Ecosystem Contributor

While the integration process for USDS could been long and tiresome, Alpha Growth team has been very supportive, and ensured the process is smooth and communicative. In addition, Alpha Growth having its own technical capacity meant that it was easier to coordinate and prepare for such partnerships.

While the governance decision is up to Compound Governance, in terms of business development and partnership, Alpha Growth has been sharp in their approach and execution.

3 Likes

In response to delegate conversations, the growth program attests that it will not vote in governance with any of the COMP with which it will be entrusted should this proposal successfully pass on-chain.

We also attest that we will not seek early re-election again as the funding we’ve requested will be enough to execute our initiatives independent of where COMP trends in the future.

1 Like

Office hours starting in 50 minutes for any community member interested in discussing the Growth Program Renewal proposal http://meet.google.com/wzg-arpw-bya

Thanks for adding these concerns we had on behalf of the Governance Working Group.

As an delegate, we are still working through this proposal for any concerns (frankly we just need to spend more time reviewing everything in depth), but can emphasize that the team has been very responsive and open to feedback.

6 Likes